All categories

3 years ago

Why were African tribes, colonies, and countries easy to conquer?

History

2 answers:

Mamont248 [21]3 years ago

7 0

These were easily conquered do to A. Them not having the fire power B. They were separate and were over whelmed

laiz [17]3 years ago

6 0

A lot of factors went into why it was so easy to conquer the Africa a few of them being
-large language barriers between tribes making it harder to relay information between each other to warn of European
-they didn't necessarily have a central form of government or unity, meaning it was usually each tribe protecting it selfs rather that all working together
-and lastly they lacked in weapons that could match the Europeans in power, (most parts of Africa didn't use metal weapons) evidently making it easier for them to lose fights

You might be interested in

How did the Wagner Act and the Social Security Act affect Americans?

Troyanec [42]

The Waganer Act. The act legalized the right to strike, barred employers for firing worker for their union activities, and required them to negotiate in good faith with a union once it had been certified as a bargaining agent by the National Labor Relations Board.

The Social Security Act placed a tax of 2 percent on labor at a time when unemployment in the United States exceeded 15 percent. Raising the cost of labor at a time when millions of people were out of work was not a policy likely to get more people back to work.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During the period of the American Revolution, these statements were made by members of which group? A. redcoats B. parriots C. N

Daniel [21]

Assuming that this is referring to the same list of statements that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be "Patriots," since the statements all have to do with liberty and separation from Britain.

3 0

3 years ago

How many countries in south America had peace corpse workers

MissTica

Over 60 countries in South America

3 0

4 years ago

How do the achievements of Mohandas Gandhi compare with those of Nelson Mandela?

True [87]

Answer:

well here are nelson Mandela's accomplishments

#1 HE BECAME THE NATIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE ANC YOUTH LEAGUE IN 1950

#2 MANDELA WAS A LEADING OPPONENT OF THE 1948 APARTHEID LEGISLATION

#3 HE CO-FOUNDED THE FIRST BLACK LEGAL PARTNERSHIP IN SOUTH AFRICA

#4 HIS SPEECH DURING RIVONIA TRIAL IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE GREAT SPEECHES OF THE 20TH CENTURY

#5 NELSON MANDELA PLAYED THE LEADING ROLE IN ENDING APARTHEID

#6 NELSON MANDELA WAS THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT OF SOUTH AFRICA

#7 HE FOCUSED ON NATIONAL RECONCILIATION DURING HIS PRESIDENCY

#8 HE SERVED AS THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE NON-ALIGNED MOVEMENT FROM 1998 TO 1999

#9 HE FOUNDED A NUMBER OF ORGANISATIONS TO PROMOTE EQUALITY AND FIGHT PROBLEMS LIKE AIDS

#10 NELSON MANDELA WAS AWARDED THE 1993 NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

whereas here are Gandhi's accomplishments:

#1 HE FOUGHT AGAINST RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN SOUTH AFRICA

#2 HIS SATYAGRAHA CAMPAIGN IN SA LED TO THE 1914 INDIAN RELIEF ACT

#3 MAHATMA GANDHI WON HIS FIRST BATTLE OF CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE IN INDIA AT CHAMPARAN

#4 HE SUCCESSFULLY LED A NON-VIOLENT TAX REVOLT IN KHEDA

#5 HE LED THE POPULAR NON-COOPERATION MOVEMENT IN EARLY 1920S

#6 MAHATMA GANDHI LED THE FAMOUS SALT MARCH TO DANDI

#7 HE LAUNCHED THE QUIT INDIA MOVEMENT IN 1942 DEMANDING END OF BRITISH RULE

#8 MAHATMA GANDHI WAS THE LEADING FIGURE RESPONSIBLE FOR INDIA ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE

#9 HE FOUGHT AGAINST SOCIAL EVILS IN SOCIETY LIKE UNTOUCHABILITY

#10 GANDHI WAS RUNNER UP TO EINSTEIN IN TIME’S PERSON OF THE CENTURY

so i think that they both achieve loads of great achievements because they made a change in the world well that's my opinion

Explanation:

While both protested oppression through peaceful resistance, Mandela eventually accepted armed resistance.

Both wanted political freedom for their respective countries. Gandhi used peaceful non-cooperation. Mandela murdered people.

so i think that

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Addressed the issue of allowing states to decide whether they wanted to be free or to allow slavery.

Marrrta [24]

Answer: The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that mandated “popular sovereignty”–allowing settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state's borders.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago