Answer:
B)The cost of energy for a company can be both a fixed cost and a variable cost.
Explanation:
Energy is a fixed cost because it is an utility that companies have to pay regardless of the level of production; they need energy to function.
Energy is a variable cost because energy is an input to production, and the amount of energy used (and hence its cost) can vary a lot depending on how much output is produced. In the question, ethanol is referenced, which is also a type of variable cost, because it is an energy source that depends on another input (corn), and its used as a substitue for gasoline.
The group or organization matchup is given below;
- Non-state actor - terrorist.
- International Organization -World Trade Organization, United Nations.
- Nation-state - Canada.
<h3>What is a Nation state?</h3>
The term nation-state is known to be a any country that is territorially held together as a sovereign state.
Note that in this kind of country, it is one that is governed in the name of a community of its own people who identify or see themselves as a nation.
See full question below
Match the group or organization on the left with its correct category on the right.
non-state actor:
terrorist
International Organization:
World Trade Organization,
United Nations
nation-state: Canada
Learn more about Nation-state from
brainly.com/question/19454824
Answer:
neither
producer surplus
consumer surplus
Explanation:
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Consumer surplus = willingness to pay – price of the good
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least price the seller is willing to sell the product
Producer surplus = price – least price the seller is willing to accept
The first scenario is neither a producer or consumer surplus because a transaction did not take place
The second scenario is a producer surplus.
the producer surplus = 60 - 55 = 5
The third scenario is a consumer surplus
consumer surplus = $114 - $107 = $7
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
Drinking from a fresh water bottle in dimensions
