False, since both roles are in the capacity of research and does not compromise results. So there is no conflict of interest in research.
Conflicts of interest are situations in which professional judgments or actions regarding a primary concern, such as a medical researcher's responsibilities, may be easily persuaded by a secondary interest, such as monetary benefit or professional advancement.
Many doctors work full-time for biotech and pharmaceutical companies, as well as medical device manufacturers. They work in research, product development, or administration. In fact, a few of them own the businesses. This is not conflict of interest.
Learn more on conflict of interest-
brainly.com/question/14940595
#SPJ4
<u />Unity of command is a principle wherein no subordinate in an organization reports to more than one boss.
Each department in a company has only one boss. Every boss of the department reports to one higher authority, and so on.
This is to avoid confusion among subordinates and to ensure that the authority of the boss is not diminish by the authority of another boss.
Start by analyzing how you're spending the day by logging your activities and eliminating time wasters. Then, organize everything around you and then prioritize your tasks and get the main things done without multitasking. Duncan also suggests systemizing all of your repetitive tasks.
mark brainliest please it would help alot
:)
Answer:
Option 1 is correct.
Explanation:
There are two types of externality:
(i) Negative externality
(ii) Positive externality
Negative externality:
Suppose there is an economic transaction initiated between the two partners and this transaction reduces the consumption of third person, then this is known as the negative externality.
For example: Smoking is one of the example of negative externality. Smoking a cigarette is not only present in the consumption bundle of a person who smokes but it also affects the health of the other person who stands near that person. So, it reduces the consumption of non smoker.
