Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Energy Transmission, Energy Disbution, and Energy Generation. Hope this helps. ;)
Answer:
B
Explanation:
hope i helped if im wrong sorry;-;
Answer:
c) capitalize in the machine account
Explanation:
Since it is given that there is an improvement made to a machine due to which it increases the machine fair market value and at the same time it also increases the production capacity of 25% without extending the useful life of the machine
So as the question is talking about the improvement of the machine so the same is to be capitalized in the machine account
Hence, the option c is correct
