They both involve moving water and some sort of damage done with the movements made.
Answer:
Eric Klinenberg, assistant professor of sociology at New York University (formally of Northwestern University), wrote "Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago" in order to further investigate the devastating Chicago heat wave of 1995. From July 13h to July 20th, the heat led to over 700 deaths and thousands being hospitalized due to heat related illness. Following the catastrophe, there have been numerous medical, meteorological, and epidemiological studies done examining the reasons for the historic mortality rate, but none seemed to focus on the on underlying issues such as social etiology. In "Heat Wave", Klinenberg, a Chicago native, takes his fascination with the social possibilities surrounding the event to greater depths.…show more content…
Here, the key health and support services of the governmental organization, the police and fire departments, include officers who are rarely committed to "soft service" work. And lastly, in chapter 5 "The Spectacular City," Klinenberg speaks about media's involvement during that time. He investigates and interviews journalists, editors, and news companies, discussing the angles at which the disaster was portrayed and why this may be. More importantly, this chapter focuses on the cultural "reframing" of the actually news and information of the heat wave. He says that Chicago used its public relations tools to deny there was a disaster and then to claim it was a natural and unpreventable one. They defended the government's role while masking the social roots of the high mortality rates during the heat wave. I originally chose this book because the brief summary given to us in class had caused me to become more interested Klinenberg's findings throughout his extensive research. This book proved to correlate directly with many of the ideas we discussed in class.
Explanation:
Politically conservative member of the Tory party
Answer:
- Surveys.
Explanation:
Surveys are described as the research method in which a predefined group is examined, assessed, or evaluated to gather information or insights about concerns or aspects associated with a topic. The potential problem with such a study method is that 'the respondents tend to answer questions in a manner that would look good or what the majority feels instead of communicating their true opinions or feelings about the issue.' Peterson and others(2011) revealed that it indirectly causes a flaw or bias in the conclusion and affects its credibility.
The narration affects Oskar's credibility in the passage from "Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close" since his attempt at self-reflection makes him seem honest.
<h3>What is narration?</h3>
We can define narration as the process or action of telling someone a story. The person who does it is called a narrator. In the passage we are analyzing here, the narrator is called Oskar, and he is showing a state of self-reflection.
Oskar explains that certain things - related to the attack on September 11 - make him panicky. He tries to honestly convey his feelings and sensations, which is why we can choose the third option as the correct answer.
Learn more about narrators here:
brainly.com/question/1528687
