1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
3 years ago
8

Answer the question in 7-10 complete sentences. Give details or examples to explain and support your answer. Attempt to answer a

ll parts of the question in paragraph form.
Based on the Source 2 chart and your knowledge of Social Studies, would you have supported the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists in the debate about whether to ratify the Constitution? Which group's beliefs do you feel are the most important to support, and why would you have supported the group you chose over the other group?

Please take very serious! Please help asap!

Social Studies
1 answer:
musickatia [10]3 years ago
7 0

Although both positions have a lot of merit and make a lot of sense, I would have supported the Federalists. I believe that this would have been likely, as their ideals match my own more closely. The Federalists believed that a strong federal government is preferable to strong state governments. I believe this to be the case, as a strong federal government is more likely to be able to ensure equal rights and protections across state lines. Moreover, a federal Constitution has the power to control the excesses and abuses of the federal government. Finally, I believe that new, modern industries were the future of the country, as opposed to farming.

You might be interested in
Can someone plz give me a brief note on nationalism... I need it badly in five minutes
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

Nationalism is when someone has total love and dignity for their country. Think of it like how Donald Trump does for America.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did mercenaries weaken the roman military
pshichka [43]
During the decline, the Roman army had been severely weakened to the point where invaders that could have previously been defeated by the Empire were eventually able to destroy it. Ultimately, the Roman Empire collapsed because of "the general failure of its armies to perform the tasks that were required of them." One reason for the breakdown of the army was that the Roman legions would fight in civil wars over their choices for Emperor because they were unhappy with the weaker Emperors that were frequent in the later Roman Empire. "These struggles served as an irresistible invitation to German and other enemies to break into the distracted provinces." Although the civil wars served as a distraction to the Roman army, the wars also had a detrimental effect on the army because they damaged its manpower, both in quality and numbers.

The Roman army during this time was divided into the high quality soldiers, called the field force, and the lower quality soldiers, referred to as the frontier force, who did not fight as much as the field force. The frontier force was mainly deployed to local garrisons that were not as volatile as the places where the field forces fought. Because of the civil wars between the legions and the battles against outside invaders and enemies of the Western Roman Empire, the field force was considerably weakened and greatly reduced in number. The field force had to take second-rate soldiers from the frontier force, thus lowering the quality of the army. The waning quality of the Roman army was not its only concern; there were also not a sufficient number of new soldiers being drafted.  all the info is in there thank litpick.com i didnt write this
7 0
3 years ago
When normalizing, the goal is to decompose relations with anomalies to produce smaller, well-structured relations. True false.
fiasKO [112]

It should be noted that the main goal when normalizing is to decompose relations, therefore, the statement given is true.

It should be noted that the main goal during normalization include the minimization of data redundancy and simplifying the enforcement of referential integrity.

Also, normalization makes it easier to maintain data and decompose relations with anomalies to produce smaller, well-structured relations.

Learn more on:

brainly.com/question/25767935

8 0
2 years ago
A researcher interested in the health problems of people with schizophrenia interviews only those people diagnosed with the diso
Illusion [34]

Answer: Non-representative sampling.

Explanation: The researcher interviewing only those diagnosed with Schizophrenia who are in an inpatient facility is a non-representative sampling because, the researcher didn't take into consideration those that are diagnose and not in an inpatient facility. It is not a true representation of the population of people with Schizophrenia.

5 0
3 years ago
So far, Crash Course has mentioned Catholicism and Lutheranism prominently in Western Europe. What other Christian religions hav
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

ns inlesu -u

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the Silk Road cities in this chart offered Silk in exchange for other goods?
    8·1 answer
  • Sara has dementia. This has been hard for her family as she is srarting to forget them and often when her daughter's come to vis
    15·1 answer
  • When chromosomes fail to separate it is known as?
    6·1 answer
  • Short Essay: Defend or Prosecute Francis Bacon’s ideas on the scientific method.
    6·1 answer
  • Costa Ricans have embraced tourism—particularly eco-tourism—as a means of stabilizing their economy. The benefits have been so s
    7·1 answer
  • BIOLOGY NEED HELP ASAP!!
    13·1 answer
  • _________ is the most common effect of dementia.
    12·2 answers
  • Which party won the presidential election held on 11th of August 1979?​
    13·1 answer
  • What is duty of workers towards manager?​
    12·1 answer
  • How many different countries help build a Boeing airplane?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!