1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
labwork [276]
3 years ago
12

there are 100 U.S senators two thirds of them must vote in favor of a proposed amendment this means that at least --------------

------ senators must support it ?
History
2 answers:
aev [14]3 years ago
8 0
100 * (2/3) ~ 66.67
Round up, because you need a whole number which is at least 66.67
And your final answer is 67.
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
5 0
67 senators must vote
You might be interested in
What is one problem with relying exclusively on a personal letter for
aev [14]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
According to the Anti-Federalists, a governing document such as the Constitution should most certainly
raketka [301]
Anti-Federalists were against the Constitution, so I'm fairly certain that the rest of that statement goes: 
According to the Anti-Federalists, a governing document such as the Constitution should most certainly fail to protect the rights of individuals and the states. 

That's the most I've got with how much you gave, I'll probably need specific choices to choose from for a more satisfying and accurate answer.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the main idea of the argument in this passage?
kompoz [17]

Answer:

The economic system is unfair, and the rich profit from the poor

Explanation:

I js took the test

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did the British plan to divide the northern colonies
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

The British planned to cut New England off from the rest of the colonies.

Explanation: hope this helped :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property. Dred Scot
erik [133]
DRED SCOTT DECISION where the Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.

These were their arguments.
<span>Dred Scott:
When a person enters a free State or territory, the free status overrides the previous condition of servitude. Since slavery was forbidden in the free States and territories by
federal and State laws, Dred Scott became free when he entered Illinois and Wisconsin.</span><span>

Sandford:
To deprive a person of property (in this case, Dred Scott) without due process or just compensation violated the 5th Amendment, which states that “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Dred Scott was still a slave and no master's property rights could be limited or taken away by a State or federal law.</span>

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The purpose of the Albany Plan of Union was to
    11·2 answers
  • Help pleaseis do in 5 minutes NEED HELP ASAP
    6·1 answer
  • During the Antebellum period, religion was used by many Americans to
    10·2 answers
  • One fact about world war one that is very unusual. (a fact that isnt well known)​
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Scientific Revolution change the way that people explained the world around them?
    15·2 answers
  • What do the nolan charts two axis represent ?
    7·1 answer
  • According to the passage, the effect of mining wealth was ____.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements are true about the 1860 presidential election? Lincoln won with only 40 percent of the popular
    8·2 answers
  • When did ruth bader ginsburg retire from the supreme court.
    8·1 answer
  • Where is The Who and the why see
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!