Answer:
The proposed witness list and notation are: Admissible as regularly conducted business.
Explanation:
The witness list and notation here should be admitted as a regularly conducted activity (business record) since it satisfies the conditions:
The writing or record which in this case is the witness list and notation will be admissible as evidence of the transaction(the witness) if it is a regularly conducted business activity as it is customary to make these records.
The business record contains matters within the personal knowledge of the entrant.
The entry was made at the time of the transaction.
This means that if the records are found and they contain the notation for the doctor witness then it will serve as proof of that fact since all the requirements for a business record(since it should be a regular course of business) are present.
I think you what to know which one they should do, the answer is the second one. In most health care commercials a company will claim higher quality in a non price competition. This is because it makes the product look cheap and ineffective as stigma points towards cheap sales as a ploy to sell a bad product or a ineffective one.<span />
A brief treatment trial tested an adaption of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) for weekly assessment of worry. 28 nonclinical high-worriers received instruction in cognitive restructuring strategies, with 14 of them acting as a control group in a lagged waiting-list design.
<h3>What do you mean by stoeber, j., & bittencourt, j. (1998)?</h3>
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire-Past Week (PSWQ-PW) was highly reliable and substantially valid in assessing both (a) the weekly status of worry and (b) treatment-related changes in worry, according to the results. The average Cronbach's alpha was 0.91, and the average convergent correlation with a past-week adaptation of the Worry Domains Questionnaire [Tallis, F., Eysenck, M. W. and Mathews (1992). a survey for measuring nonpathological anxiety [Zielke, M. and Kopf-Mehnert, C., Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 161–168.] was 0.63, and pre-post progress on the PSWQ–PW had a 0.71 connection with the Questionnaire of Changes in Experiencing and Behavior (1978). Questions about changing one's experiences and behaviors. Germany's Weinheim: Beltz Test Gesellschaft.
To learn more about Questionnaire, Visit:
brainly.com/question/25685309
#SPJ4
Answer:
high ability in written expression and low ability in oral expression
Explanation:
For the teacher to prepare good handout for the students shows that, he has a HIGH ABILITY IN WRITTEN EXPRESSION. However, since the teacher was unable to convey the steps and procedures involved in lectures and discussions, this shows that the teacher has a LOW ABILITY IN ORAL EXPRESSION.
Hence, the correct answer is that, the teacher demonstrated, high ability in written expression and low ability in oral expression.
Answer:
Recency effect
Explanation:
Recency effect is the belief that audience's retention of information or ideas or in short-term memory is dependent on the order of presentation. More recently acquired information are easily and well remembered to make judgement or decision than the earlier acquired information.
