1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
10

Did President Clinton support or oppose globalization support your answer with historical evidence

History
1 answer:
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
6 0
President Clinton was clearly in the support of globalisation. He signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which decreased the barriers in the trades between America, Mexico and Canada, in 1994. He built strong alliances with Aisa and Europe also. 
You might be interested in
Which places were connected by the triangular trade
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

The Triangular Trade is a term used to describe the trade occurring between England, Africa, and the Americas.

<em>L</em><em>o</em><em>v</em><em>e</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>g</em><em>o</em><em>c</em><em>r</em><em>y</em>

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Thomas Paine argued in Common Sense that
yaroslaw [1]

Answer:

The answer is C. monarchy is a dangerous type of government.

Explanation:

Took the test on edge :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following applies to U.S. expansion in the Pacific? (A)The United States annexed Hawaii. (B)The United States acqui
bogdanovich [222]
Which of the following applies to U.S. expansion in the Pacific, I think the answer should be A. The United States is to annexed Hawaii. Hope it helped you!!!!
7 0
4 years ago
Why did the students' lawyers argue that wearing the armbands was protected by the first amendment?
Mekhanik [1.2K]
Because it is protected as exercising freedom of speech
8 0
3 years ago
Is this desirable to have states that have different laws than federal laws, or have different laws from state to state
krek1111 [17]
However, if a state law affords a person more rights than federal law, the state law is legally presumed to prevail, albeit only within that state. At the same time, if a state imposes more responsibility on its residents than the federal law, the state law<span> prevails.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What policy did Kennedy lay the groundwork for at the end of his presidency?
    8·2 answers
  • A. Matthew Jamison<br> B. Deborah Johnstone<br> C. Josh Barriston<br> D. Liza Maxwell
    5·2 answers
  • Conservative forces during the reign of German emperor William II supported democratic reforms. Please select the best answer fr
    5·1 answer
  • What does an oak tree do at a theatre when a movie ends
    15·2 answers
  • What benefit were colonies supposed to have for the nations who had them?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Church gain control back when Edward VI was king, and how
    12·1 answer
  • Who arrived to live with the Franks?
    8·2 answers
  • What happens to a bill that has been passed by Congress but vetoed by the president?
    9·1 answer
  • What are three main differences between Robber Barons and Captains of Industry?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the only British Pope ever?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!