Did President Clinton support or oppose globalization support your answer with historical evidence

1 answer:

6 0

President Clinton was clearly in the support of globalisation. He signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which decreased the barriers in the trades between America, Mexico and Canada, in 1994. He built strong alliances with Aisa and Europe also.

You might be interested in

During the reign of Louis XVI things changed radically for the absolute monarchy discuss the economic situation of the commoners

crimeas [40]

Answer:Peasants were unhappy with the depletion of royal coffers, two decades of poor harvests, drought, cattle disease and skyrocketing bread prices. Peasants had heavy taxes imposed on them while the Catholic Church was got off scot-free.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which were actions the Daughters of Liberty took in response to British laws? Select the two correct

luda_lava [24]

Answer:

The correct answers are

A) Boycotting British goods

E) Holding Spinning bees

Explanation:

The Daughters of Liberty were the female equivalent of The Sons of Liberty. Both were formal associations that were build to protest the British Stamp law and the Townshend Act on the American colonies.

The overall goal was to boycott British goods and as most women were responsible for buying groceries and other goods for their houses, they were symbols of defiance.

The Association also held regular 'spinning bees' where women would spin cloth to provide for local people. This was done in order to reduce dependence on imported textile products from Great Britain.

4 0

2 years ago

Will give brainliest please I need help :)

GuDViN [60]

Explanation:

1. I agree with the Sitting Bull's quote. It makes me feel a bit upset, Sitting Bull conveyed great emotion within the 8 sentence that are there.

2. I do not think western settlers could have coexisted with tribes they encountered due to how persistent Sitting Bull was for fighting for the Native American's freedom from the Western Settlers.

3. I do not think Native Americans should have been put on reservations. The Native Americans were there before the Western Settlers were, this is their land.

4. No, I do not think Native Americans should have adapted to settler ways. Native Americans have their own culture which the settlers should not intervene with.

5. The settlers and federal government was not within their rights to conquer Native Americans and take their homelands. The Native Americans have their own rights just as much the settlers did. The homelands were where they lived. They were not above the Native Americans.

8 0

2 years ago

During the American Civil War, the southern states organized themselves into a loosely connected group that gave little power to

Citrus2011 [14]

Answer: Confederation, Non-partisan democracy

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Who was the father of the declaration of independence?

Marysya12 [62]

Answer: james madison

Explanation:

thomas jefferson is commonly thought to be, but president james madison was.

4 0

2 years ago