It would be "Oppressive othering" that most <span>defines other groups as morally or intellectually inferior, since in this case the word "oppressive" implies that one group is being subjected to the will of another. </span>
japan seized manchuria because japanese believed that japans empire should be equal to the size of the western powers empire
They faced racism constantly
Hey. U see ur question copy and paste it on the search and there is the same question u want. And there is one answer and its long. I hope it helps to find ur answer. Sorry i am not that good to answer this question
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.
yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.
No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.
hope it helps!
