In a cornfield, only one plant species has dominated the area, that is the corn plant. While in a natural meadow, multiple species of plants occurs of different species. The presence of the different types of plants in the meadow will interact more number of insects in it as compared to the corn field. This will lead to more interactions among the different species in a natural meadow. The greater biodiversity of the natural meadow than the cornfield will support it better.
In case of any natural disaster, or a pest attack, all the plants will be killed in a corn field and so will the insects dependent on them, but in a natural meadow, if one plant species is killed by a natural disaster, other will still be alive. Hence, the ability to survive is greater in natural meadow.
I think the answer is C and D
Answer:
C. The results of a model event may not be similar enough to the results of the actual event.
Explanation:
The problem with models is that sometimes we trust them too much! Sometimes they are not accurate for long-term actual events. This is answer choice C.
- Models are never more accurate than reality, so rule out A.
- The model is based on our predictions of the actual event, so rule out B.
- The model being "too similar" to the actual event is what we want! So rule out D.
A scientific theory may be revised overtime because it goes to the loop of science which what's the scientific theory to test several times each time a different product may be shown or every now and then a different product may be shown so therefore over time as it goes through the loop of science a scientific theory may change or be revised
Answer:
BR
Because the first letter comes first
