C). Is insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Explanation:
A defendant whose conviction has been reversed because the evidence 'proved insufficient to prove the guilt or crime committed by him/her beyond a logical doubt'. Thus, the decision or verdict terminates the double jeopardy and the defendant can not be retried in such a situation as the reversal from the claim would be parallel to an acquittal. Thus, if a case is reversed due to the lack of sufficient evidences as a matter of legal law, the defendant can't be retried.
Unfortunately it has become the most meme one of them all due to Mussolini driving the country into a war, let alone trying to restore the Holy Roman Empire, when the country was not at the correct position to do so.