The given statement is False.
People who keep domestic animals are strictly liable for any harm inflicted by the animals.
Explanation:
People keep many type of animals as pets in their homes. Some of the common animals which are being kept as pets are:
So if animals kept by people in their homes harm someone, or something, then the owner of the animal is not liable for it. This is because the animal's behavior is not is control of the people. People can only train them, but to always obey the owner is not in the hands of the owner. The nature of animals may not always remain the same, they can cause harm to things or people, but because they are animals, so the owner is not liable.
For example, a man has a dog as pet and his dog went in the neighbor's garden and dig the soil. In this case the owner is not liable for the damage the dog caused. No doubt the owner could help the neighbor in settling the things together but he is not liable for the damage,
Learn more about animals at:
brainly.com/question/11013494
#LearnWithBrainly
George Washington offered to lead the men in the Battle of Boston.
In the 1900"s the European nations were feeling pretty good about their situations. They had colonies around the globe, industrialization was good, their music and art were the envy of the world and they could have their pick of whatever they wanted. So, when they said "The world's my oyster" it meant that they could have whatever they wanted at the time.
Answer:
safety
Explanation:
Considering the scenario described in the question, the right answer is SAFETY.
The Management needs to be aware of Elizabeth's unmet SAFETY needs because, considering the situation, the environmental information available to Elizabeth is that she has unmet SAFETY needs, that is there is still a potential threat to her.
Hence, the management should do the needful by ensuring all necessary safety needs are put in place.
