1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-s [515]
3 years ago
11

In many contexts, scholars find that students perform better in school when their credentials are closer to those of their class

mates, whereas they have more trouble persisting in a difficult major, graduating from college, or getting a good job when they are surrounded by peers who have much higher credentials. This has been referred to as the mismatch effect. If we assume the mismatch effect is real, what would a utilitarian say this suggests about the use of strong affirmative action
Social Studies
1 answer:
Veseljchak [2.6K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The mismatch effect illustrates how strong affirmative action is not always beneficial to minorities.

Explanation:

In psychology, the mismatch effect is a theory that analyzes the impact of a different environment or condition on an organism with adaptive traits inherited from the past generation. The negative effect is called a mismatch and the subject can not adapt to the new or different condition.

You might be interested in
When we see people expressing emotions such as anger, fear, and joy we use information from all of these to interpret their feel
Rom4ik [11]
The one that cannot be used to interpret their feeling are: The words they use

Most people will interpret communication 7% from the verbal language and 93% from the non-verbal cue.
To fully interpret one's feeling, it is important to pay attention to their non-verbal cues such as intonation, their expression, the volume of their voice, and their gesture
8 0
4 years ago
Because nonindustrial economies can have features of both horticulture and agriculture, it is useful to discuss cultivators as b
Serjik [45]

Answer:

(D) increasing economic specialization.

Explanation:

On a cultivation continuum we can appreciate the many ways in which people can conduct agriculture and horticulture. On one end of the spectrum, we find the most primitive ways of conducting such practices. These are usually small-scale gardens with a variety of crops that are mostly used for subsistence. However, as we move towards the other end of the spectrum, we see large-scale farming. Large farms and plantations appear, as well as cash crops (crops grown in order to be sold, not consumed by the farmers). Moreover, we start seeing increased economic specialization. Farmers begin to focus on a single crop, or even a single variety of crop. Trade also becomes more complex.

7 0
3 years ago
Who was Ashoka? ........
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

Ashoka, also known as Ashoka the Great, was an Indian emperor of the Maurya Dynasty, who ruled almost all of the Indian subcontinent from c. 268 to 232 BCE. The grandson of the founder of the Maurya Dynasty, Chandragupta Maurya, Ashoka promoted the spread of Buddhism across ancient Asia

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The<br> *<br> resulted in glaciers covering much of the Earth.
Alexxx [7]

Answer: A glacier's weight, combined with its gradual movement, can drastically reshape the landscape over hundreds or even thousands of years.

Explanation:

The ice erodes the land surface and carries the broken rocks and soil debris far from their original places, resulting in some interesting glacial landforms.

7 0
3 years ago
The Anti-Federalists wanted toa. ratify the Constitution.b. refuse to vote on ratifying the Constitution.c. vote against the Con
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

B. refuse to vote on ratifying the Constitution.

Explanation:

Federalists wanted a strong executive branch and government while the anti-federalists wanted a  weaker central government.

Anti federalists were loose political coalition of politicians who opposed the strong central government that the US constitution of 1787 created. Their efforts led to the addition of Bill of Rights to the US constitution.

They were afraid of the authority of single, strong national government, as it could easily encroach upon the rights of the individuals and the states. So they wanted a Bill of Rights to be added to the constitution to safeguard the people from the Strong central government.

Anti federalists were strong in New York, Massachusetts and Virginia. James Winthrop of Massachusetts, George Mason and Patrick Henry of Virginia were some of the famous anti federalists.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Rachel's parents used to pay her an allowance every week to feed the cats and to do a few other chores around the house. However
    10·1 answer
  • In countries with this cultural context, employees tend to prefer fixed compensation packages. A. high uncertainty avoidance B.
    9·1 answer
  • Children who are hard of hearing
    8·2 answers
  • Which poem-turned-song, written by Katharine Lee Bates, was originally called “Pikes Peak” and describes our country’s natural s
    15·1 answer
  • If a stressor is unavoidable, there are still measures one can take to minimize the intensity of the stress. For instance, takin
    8·1 answer
  • Marissa just finished completing her new employee questionnaire form for a job in sales. Despite being a rather shy, introverted
    14·1 answer
  • Why were some states worried about having a president?
    12·1 answer
  • What was promised to Christians for participating on the Crusade.
    11·2 answers
  • Low level of enforcement on unsafe road use​
    14·1 answer
  • 100 points &amp; brainliest.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!