Answer:
i dont think that russia is responsable for WWI but germany is, it had the resources to end it by withdrawing its blank cheque which offered suport to austria for its invasion to serbia. russian leaders knew that it would have been in a much stronger position to fight in two years, after having completed its rearmament plan.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not specify the time in history or any specific context, we are going to assume that you are referring to the US imperialistic role through history.
Being that the case, we can comment on the following.
The foreign policy actions of the United States reflect selfish, imperialist ambitions since the times of President James Polk and the Manifested Destiny. He expanded the US territory acquiring the Mexican northern states after the Mexican-American War.
Since those years, passing through the times of President Monroe and the Monroe Doctrine and President Theodore Roosevelt and his Roosevelt corollary, the United States has always had interventionist purposes as part of its foreign agenda.
Nobody has granted the US the right or role to be the "big brother" who was looking after the interests of the western hemisphere. That is why the US has had many problems throughout history in the Middle East, Latin America, Europe, and other regions.
During the 16th to 18th century, Southeast Asia was a diverse region in terms of geography and culture. However, most part of it was governed by the Mughal state. In that time, there was a unified system when it comes to currency system, organization of the mint, taxation system, and maintenance of law and order.
The Tariff of Abominations of 1828 was opposed mainly because "<span>(C) it hurt the sale of southern cotton," since the sale and trade of cotton from the American South was one of the most lucrative business ventures of the age. </span>
