Answer:
The upheaval was caused by widespread discontent with the French monarchy and the poor economic policies of King Louis XVI
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Internal coherence demonstrates how the parts of a hypothesis are coherent, or rationally connected.
B. Internal coherence is important because if a theory has internal inconsistencies, then its assumptions cannot all be correct.
C. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
Internal coherence may be defined as a ability of the educators in the school or in a system to connect the resources and align them to carry an improvement strategy and also engaging them in collective learning. It also helps to use the learning to provide the students with a richer educational opportunities.
Internal Coherence is the extent to which a component ideas of any hypothesis are rationally connected.
The <em>concept of scarcity</em> states that there will be a deficit regarding the supply of a certain good in comparison the demand for it. Therefore, a state budget must revise its current state knowing that there will always be some players who will lose benefits in the attempt of shifting the assignment of resources.
The <em>marginal analysis</em> is an examination of the additional benefits a certain activity gets compared to a number of additional resources assigned to it. It helps the state government have a better view of where to allocate resources. As there are sectors that will probably gain more benefits than others with the same assigning of resources. The key to this analysis is to now the best amount to allocate to each sector in order to get the maximum efficiency of the budget.
This argument is based on "the linguistic relativity hypothesis".
The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a dialect influences its speakers' reality view or discernment. Prevalently known as the Sapir– Whorf theory, or Whorfianism, the standard is regularly characterized to incorporate two forms. The solid form says that dialect decides thought and that etymological classifications confine and decide intellectual classifications, while the feeble adaptation says that phonetic classifications and use just impact thought and choices.
When a passing a truck if you are in the rear of the truck but cannot get a visual on what could be ahead and you want to change lane just to pass it you should first get a visual if there is no car in the other lane to avoid collision and if you are passed by a truck you should not speed up and let the truck passed you to avoid accident
