Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
If you are relatively better at something, then you are said to have a absolute advantage in that activity.
<h3>What is
absolute advantage?</h3>
Absolute advantage serves as an economic concept which is been used to describe a party's superiority as regards the production capability.
It should be noted that this is the ability to produce a certain good or service at lower cost , hence If you are relatively better at something, then you are said to have a absolute advantage in that activity.
Learn more on absolute advantage at:
brainly.com/question/9067127
#SPJ1
Answer:
Our schema for the event selectively "tunes" our attention toward expected events and away from unexpected events.
Explanation:
Schema can be defined as follows;
1. A hypothetical knowledge structure that contains what a person knows about a particular concept, including the relations among objects, relevant events, actions and sequences of actions
Example 1: Your knowledge of an egg
once it is activated, it affects attention, interpretation and memory
Example 2: A recovering alcoholic is interested in dating a librarian and sees her at a party and his friend says she was drinking beer.
but he swears she was drinking soda. His schemas about librarians led him to improperly encode what she was drinking.
2. When people have judgements about everyday events, the feature-matching process usually leads people to select the right schema to encode a given event.
3. The influence of schemas on behavior: research in which participants who were primed to think of elderly people later walked more slowly down a hallway.
