For x > 2, you would circle the 2, but you would not shade it in because it is greater than/ less than, not greater than or equal to/less than or equal to. From there on, you would move it to the right, because here x is greater than 2, and the numbers to the right of 2 are greater than two.
For x < 2, you would again circle the 2, but don't shade it in. And then you would make a line heading towards the left, because the numbers to the left of 2 are smaller than 2, and here, x is smaller than 2, since 2 is greater.
A value that is not the solution to either inequality is 2. 2 is not greater than 2, and 2 is not less than 2.
All you have to do is 14*.30 which equals to $4.20
Answer: He earned 43,344 a year and earned and earned 3612 a month
The true statement about the residual plot is (a) The regression line is a good model because there is no pattern in the residuals.
<h3>How to interpret the residual plot?</h3>
For a residual plot to be considered a good model, the points on the plot must be at random and they must not follow a specific pattern
From the graph, we can see that the points are scattered
Hence, the true statement about the residual plot is (a)
Read more about residual plots at:
brainly.com/question/9329287
#SPJ1
