Answer:
225 frogs
Step-by-step explanation:
Total population of frogs = 300 frogs.
Observed population of frogs = 24
6 of the 24 observed frogs had spots
Which means , the number of frogs that did not have spots = 24 - 6 = 18 frogs.
We were told to find how many of the total population can be predicted to NOT have spots. We would form a proportion.
If 24 frogs = 18 frogs with no spots
300 frogs = Y
Cross multiply
24Y = 300 × 18
Y = (300 × 18) ÷ 24
Y = 5400 ÷ 24
Y = 225 frogs.
This means out of 300 frogs, 225 frogs do not have spots.
Therefore, the total population that can be predicted to NOT have spots is 225 frogs.
the total population can be predicted to NOT have spots
Answer:
Occam’s razor theory.
Step-by-step explanation:
This theory is known as Occam’s razor theory.
It's a theory based on the principle whereby we give precedence to simplicity. It states that out of two competing theories, the one with the simpler explanation of an object should be embraced over the other. The reason is that the philosopher William of Ockham said that "objects are not meant to be multiplied beyond absolute necessity.”
This definition resonates with what is explained in the question.
Thus, the theory is as explained.
You may find it easiest if you convert all the fractions to decimal form:
5.433...
5.166...
5.756
Now reorder these from smallest to largest.
Note: I had to guess that by "68,90," you actually meant "68/90."
I believe the answer is letter D
Answer:
I keep getting no solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.
5(x−4)=−9+5x+15
(5)(x)+(5)(−4)=−9+5x+15(Distribute)
5x+−20=−9+5x+15
5x−20=(5x)+(−9+15)(Combine Like Terms)
5x−20=5x+6
5x−20=5x+6
Step 2: Subtract 5x from both sides.
5x−20−5x=5x+6−5x
−20=6
Step 3: Add 20 to both sides.
−20+20=6+20
0=26
