<em>The United States had a democratic government.</em>
Explanation:
The United States and the USSR had little to no trust for each other and that was because they both wanted two entirely different things...
The United States focused on freedom and having a democratic government. Americans wanted to be able to choose their future leaders by voting, while also having the option of overruling them if they abused their power or did not do what was in the benefit of the people.
The Soviet Union wanted communism, where essentially the government has control over everything. The USSR not only wanted this, but they wanted worldwide communism and to keep expanding.
While both of them wanted different things, it was hard to get along and come to terms with each other. They both wanted to expand completely different ideas and ideologies.
Based on the information given, it should be noted that Booker T. Washington’s Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute grew from a small school into a university.
It should be noted that Booker T. Washington was an educator and a reformer. He was the first president and was the developer of the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute.
It should be noted that Booker T. Washington’s Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute grew from a small school into a university.
Learn more about universities on:
brainly.com/question/1086066
I believe the answer is: C) It helps citizens become aware of a politician’s wrongdoings.
Without the free press, politicians could make legislation which would not be beneficial for the citizens even without the awareness of the citizens.
But the freeedom of press need to be accompanied with accountability to ensure that the press do not intentionally created a biased point of view when presenting their piece.
Answer:
Economic diplomacy
Explanation:
Economic diplomacy is a central aspect of Chinese foreign policy. During China's remarkable economic rise, it has used economic diplomacy primarily through trade, and the use of carrots as a means to accumulate or attract soft power. This was a part of the broader strategy formulated by think tanks in the PRC during the 1990s titled the new security concept. It is referred to in the West as the period of "China's Peaceful Rise".[6]
Recently, China has changed its strategic doctrine and begun to use economic diplomacy as a coercive tool. After 10 years or so of a policy based primarily on economic carrots, China has begun to show a willingness to use economic diplomacy for coercive means.[7] This is evidenced in the September 2010 incident that blocked shipments of rare earth minerals to Japan. Another incident took place in 2012 in the Philippines, where China sent a gunboat in to enforce trade restricts. China's willingness to use bring in warships during trade disputes is reminiscent to an earlier era of American gunboat diplomacy.[8]
Recent history shows that as China grows more confident, we will see it gradually move away from an economic diplomacy policy of carrots, to sticks.
Answer:
The term Dual Federalism refers to the political system through which a federalism is established where both the Federal State and the local States divide powers and limit each other with respect to their functions, each exercising their own and without getting involved in the other's.
For its part, the term Cooperative Federalism refers to the federalist political system by which the Federal State and the local States have a differentiation in terms of their levels of performance, but not in terms of their tasks, with which they cooperate with each other to compliance with government objectives.
Personally, I believe that cooperative federalism is more effective, as both spheres of government deal with similar issues, and control each other through a co-participatory and non-restrictive regime as in the case of dual federalism.
