2. Europeans wanted to share their wealth with the less fortunate.
The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
<span>The main way in which their settlements differed was that the Chavin settled the highlands while the Nazca settled the valleys, which led to different farming techniques. </span>
Children were forced to work at a very young age and the machines were very dangerous you could lose fingers hands or limbs in general they didn’t get paid much and they worked long shifts for barely anything they struggled to buy things and support themselves to live never mind an entire family they were getting low wage for how many hours they were working a day and there physical health wasn’t good their bodies would ache but they had no choice to work they had to work to provide the things they needed to live and they barely were able to get food from the money they were making that’s how low it was
They wanted the areas that produced more gold.
