Answer:
Explanation:
The series of events that led to the birth of modern science is called the Scientific Revolution. It occurred between about 1540 and 1700. Why would the birth of science be called a “revolution”? The answer is that science was a radical new idea. It was a completely different way of looking at the world.
Before the Scientific Revolution, most educated people who studied the world took guidance from the explanations given by authorities like ancient Greek writers and Catholic Church officials. After the Scientific Revolution, educated people placed more importance on what they observed and less on what they were told. They gained knowledge by observing the world around them and coming up with logical explanations for what they saw.
U.s <span>partner up with during WWI was with the French </span>
Answer:
separate themselves from those who were unlike them
Explanation:
As nationalism emerged in kingdoms and other regions of the world, where previously the notion of being a group with a common past, culture and history, and the shared language similarities did not exist before.
A conscience of sharing this heritage make them different to other groups that promoted other set of values.
Nationalism was driven often by romantic feelings, or revolutionary ideals, like the wave that schocked European continent with Napoleon Bonaparte.
The desire of people to have a shared identity often led to social movements that wanted to form their own nation-state, also leading to wars of Independence: (For example Serbia, and Bosnia in the Austro-Hungarian Empire). Poland sought always independence from the Russian and German oppresors (embracing the so called Romantic -Nationalism).
A common misconception is that ruthless dictatorships characterize communism. As part of Fidel Castro's revolutionary reforms, he nationalized<u> </u>Cuba's economy. Compared to Fidel Castro's presidency, today's Cuban government has<u> </u><u>remained much the same</u>
More about Fidel Castro:
At the end of the 20th century, Fidel Castro was the only non-elected executive still in power in Latin America. His personalist leadership style was closer to that of traditional caudillos than to what many would consider to be the hallmarks of a military dictatorship. Although caudillos could be civilians and represented a range of ideologies, "dictatorship" in Latin America typically refers to right-wing leaders who uphold their positions of power by using disproportionately strong military force.
Learn more about Fidel Castro here:
brainly.com/question/3512621
#SPJ1
An act or policy of expansion carried out by one state at the expense of another by means of an unprovoked military attack
