Answer:
rough endoplasmic reticulum
If a scientist sets up an experiment and the results do not support his hypothesis he should conclude that "he may want to alter some aspects of experiment and try it again".
<u>Answer:</u> Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Research and experimenting is all about search and re-search for achieving acceptable result in order to meet the demand of project accordingly. It demand huge patience and hard work but also smart work for saving time as much as possible.
If a scientist results do not support hypothesis than after a short break he should alter some steps or parameters of experiment and try it again. Because it may occurred due to an error. And errors are needed to be understood and then rectify it by repeating the procedures with more sincerity.
Answer:
The amount of fossil fuels formed is much less than the amount used.
Explanation:
Fossil fuels, which include petroleum, coal, natural gas etc are an example of non-renewable sources of energy. They are termed non-renewable because they are sources that gets exhausted quickly without replenishment.
One of the characteristics of non-renewable sources of energy is that they get exhausted faster than they can be produced. Hence, regarding fossil fuels as an example of non-renewable source of energy, this means that the amount of fossil fuels formed is much less than the amount used.
Answer:
Because they are not working together
Explanation:your welcome
Answer: it’s 10%
Explanation: Primary consumers only obtain a fraction of the total solar energy—about 10%—captured by the producers they eat. The other 90% is used by the producer for growth, reproduction, and survival, or it is lost as heat. You can probably see where this is going. Primary consumers are eaten by secondary consumers.
