The British were at a disadvantage since they were fighting on land that was not their own, and they didn't know it as well.
1-didn't give power to tax so the nation had trouble raising money for their debts
2-Couldnt send military or officials to stop rebellions like shay's rebellion
3-Overall limited the power of the government and stopped them from regulating the nation to it's best
I think it would be ( They mainly stayed out of sight, but were in complete control of all matters big and small.) hope this helps.
Answer:
1.
there is a point on which most economists agree, it is that trade among nations makes the world better off. Yet international trade can be one of the most contentious of political issues, both domestically and between governments.
When a firm or an individual buys a good or a service produced more cheaply abroad, living standards in both countries increase. There are other reasons consumers and firms buy abroad that also make them better off—the product may better fit their needs than similar domestic offerings or it may not be available domestically. In any case, the foreign producer also benefits by making more sales than it could selling solely in its own market and by earning foreign exchange (currency) that can be used by itself or others in the country to purchase foreign-made products.
2.
America cannot have a growing economy or lift the wages and incomes of our citizens unless we continue to reach beyond our borders and sell products, produce, and services to the 95% of the world’s population that lives outside the United States.
To sum it down Congress' challenge was whether to allow slavery in new territories, it was so because the southern states had helped drastically in the Mexican-American war and from which they believed they would receive a reward for, Congress ended up splitting have of the new territories into slave states and non slave states.
