One argument was that <span>it was critical for the south's agricultural economy.
</span>
C the glorious and French Revolution
(Take this response with a grain of salt.)
I personally think that neither should determine that. Both questions are unable to determine whether the religion is true; so why would it be used to determine whether or not people have the right to follow it. However, putting that aside, I think the best answer would be how good their followers are. It doesn't determine whether the religion is true or not but it rids us of the toxic religions that spread negative messages. Considering how much racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism is in most religions it'd be interesting to see most religions cease.
Including commonly followed religions like Catholicism.
*I don’t have your reading material, so I’m going off of reading material I’ve read in the past
I choose and agree with Cleisthenes. He believed in democracy unlike Aristotle. He believed that the government should ran fairly and that aristocratic families should not have so much power over the majority, and wanted to prevent another era of tyranny at all cost, thus the reason he is name the “Father of Democracy “.
Before the Cleisthenes the Athens government was dominated by tyranny, he reformed their constitution and added public participation.
You can use this as a rough draft or something, or take some ideas you find useful. You’re welcome.
