The correct answer is C. Students communicate results in laboratory reports, and professional scientists communicate results in scientific journals.
Explanation:
Both students and scientists can carry out scientific research that involves studying a phenomenon by using the scientific method and scientific instruments. However, professional scientists and students differ in their level of knowledge and expertise in science. This makes scientific research made by scientists to have some differences in comparison to scientific research by students.
One of these differences is the way results are communicated. Indeed, students develop simple scientific research and the results are communicated in laboratory reports at school, colleges, etc. On the other hand, professional scientists develop complex research. Due to this, results are communicated in academic texts with strict criteria and that can be seen by other scientists, these are known as scientific journals.
The preferred prey item would be frogs.
What is optimal foraging theory?
It is a theory in ecology that proposes that predating animals that get the most energy from minimal efforts are favored by natural selection.
In order words, selection forces prefer investing minimum energy in order to extract maximally available energy.
In this case, the heron needs to use the lowest time to harvest the maximum energy possible. Since all the preys offer the same amount of energy, the one that requires the lowest time would be preferable for the heron.
In other words, frogs would be the most preferable prey.
More on foraging theory can be found here: brainly.com/question/16970714
#SPJ12
<span>C. I and III only is the answer hope i helped</span>
Answer:
seems you forgot the "followings" but here are some known limiting factors
Explanation:
Exercise,Physiology, Mindset, Nutrition and Genetics.
Answer:
increasing[1], higher[2], space[3], food[4], climate change[5].
Explanation:
Because global temperatures are <u>increasing[1]</u>, some species are seeking out <u>higher[2]</u> elevations in the Himalayas to colonize. Scientists were worried that these organisms would not have enough <u>space[3]</u> to live, but they have found that there is adequate <u>food[4]</u> at higher elevations. This movement may help these organisms survive the effects of <u>climate change[5].</u>
(Although am positive about 1, 2 and 5, you will need to double check 3 and 4. What I can tell you is that I don't think lifespan has to do with 3 or 4. I chose space and food simply due to the thought that more species moving to higher elevations allows for less space to live, but more prey to be hunted easier.)
