Answer:
A) Distance time graph
B) d(t) = 25t
C) The expression shows the distance more clearly.
Step-by-step explanation:
A) A distance time graph as seen in the attachment provides a representation of the distance travelled.
We are told the car travels at a constant speed of 100 meters per 4 seconds. Which means that 100 m for each 4 hours. So, for 200m, it's 8 hours like seen in the graph and for 300m,it's 12 hours as seen in the graph.
B) And expression for the distance is;
d = vt
Where;
d is distance in metres
v is speed in m/s and t is time
We are told that the car travels at a constant speed of 100 meters per 4 seconds.
Thus, v = 100/4 = 25 m/s
Distance travelled over time is;
d(t) = 25t
C) Looking at both A and B above, it's obvious that the expression of the distance shows a more clearer way of getting the distance because once we know the time travelled, we will just plug it into the equation and get the distance. Whereas, for the representation form, one will need to longer graphs if the time spent is very long.
3.006 rounded to the nearest tenth is 3.0. This is due to the fact that
the 6 rounded up will mean that the current 0 becomes 1, but this will
not be carried to the tenth when rounding up.
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
no,
it is not in the form

The commutative property states that you can invert the order of the terms of a sum:

So, if you start with

Applying the commutative property you'll get
