The rule of law has been linked to a number of positive social outcomes, including higher rates of economic growth, less violence, reduced inequality, better health, and higher literacy.
More detail about this is provided below.
<h3>Just what are the benefits of a government based on the rule of law?</h3>
One of the many advantages of a society based on the Rule of law is that it helps to protect the judicial system's autonomy. Modern conceptions of the Rule of Law involve safeguarding the judicial system's impartiality.
This indicates that wherever the Rule of Law functions in the true and contemporary meaning of the term, there is an increase in the independence of the judicial system.
Stronger economic growth, more peace, less inequality, better health outcomes, and more educational opportunities have all been linked to the rule of law.
You may learn more about the concept of rule of law at this link: brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ1.
Castner Cutthroat i think
The himalayas divide china from the middle east
The correct answer is 40 to 45 percent
People holding regular manual or blue-collar jobs. Certain members of this class, such as electricians, may have higher incomes than people in the lower-middle class. Roughly 40 to 45 percent of the United States
Answer:
If isolationism has become outdated, what kind of foreign policy does the United States follow? In the years after World War II, the United States was guided generally by containment — the policy of keeping communism from spreading beyond the countries already under its influence. The policy applied to a world divided by the Cold War, a struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, containment no longer made sense, so in the past ten years, the United States has been redefining its foreign policy. What are its responsibilities, if any, to the rest of the world, now that it has no incentive of luring them to the American "side" in the Cold War? Do the United States still need allies? What action should be taken, if any, when a "hot spot" erupts, causing misery to the people who live in the nations involved? The answers are not easy.
mark me brainliest plz :)
