Answer:
Soft rationing
Explanation:
Soft rationing is when a company reduces the capital funds it uses for it business processes. This can occur as a result of internal factors like shareholders not wanting to have a high debt profile for the company, wanting to raise capital slowly, and the uncertainty of future funding needs (some future project may be more important than present ones).
In this scenario Brubaker & Goss management has decided to allocate the available funds based on the profitability index of each project since the company has insufficient funds to fulfill all of the requests.
This is using soft rationing to limit use of funds.
Answer:
It should be credited at the amount of the fair value at the date when the property is invested in a partnership.
Explanation:
The non cash property should be credited at the amount of its fair value on the date of the investment, so if someone wants to invest their building in a partnership it will be recognized at the fair value decided between the investor and the partnership owners at the date at which it is invested.
The answer to this question is A product page
For lower income people:
The more the government puts towards health care would mean there would be a higher quality of life for low income areas allowing them to get access to needed healthcare for no cost to them.
For higher income people / corporate entities:
it would mean higher taxes on the 1% and 0.1% of the richer people and raising taxes on corporations such as higher taxes on dividends.
Summary:
For a SoL on one side to change another side would have to lose.
Part 1. The problem with the manager asking for an adjustment of the bad debt loss to meet the desired bonus is that it is <u>unethical</u>.
<h3>What is ethical accounting?</h3>
Ethical accounting follows the specific rules of the accounting profession and not the personal biases of management.
Accounting ethics deals with the following principles:
- Integrity
- Objectivity
- Professionalism,
- Confidentiality
- Professional competence and due care.
Part 2. The amount that would be recorded as the bad debt expense is $10,560
<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>
2% of $33,000 = $660
5% of $14,000 = $700
10% of $22,000 = $2,200
25% of $12,000 = $3,000
40% of $10,000 = $4,000
Total $10,560
Part 3. The bad debt expense for the year would be $10,560 if there were no previous balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Part 4. Since the required information is lacking, we can conclude that it is unethical behavior if the bad debt expense must be adjusted to meet the desired bonus target.
Learn more about ethical accounting at brainly.com/question/13396824
#SPJ1
