Many Americans were satsified with the Article of Confederation because it gave states more rights and the government less.
Answer:
a) Fees earned (or revenues) will be understated. Net income will be understated.
b) Accounts (fees) receivable (or assets) will be understated. Owner’s equity will
be understated.
Explanation:
Adjusting entries refers to the entries that are made at the end of an accounting period in accordance with revenue recognition, principle and expense recognition principle.
All adjusting entries affect at least one income statement account (revenue or expense), and one statement of position account (asset or liability).
I believe the answer is: <span>Once he eats, he has to go outside and patrol the backyard.”
Since the article is about various dog breeds, the writer should avoid mentioning anything specific about the dog species or personal trainer experiences. From the options above, only this line could explain dog behaviors in general.</span><span />
Answer:
Functionalist perspective
Explanation:
The functionalist perspective sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through a macro-level orientation and broadly focuses on the social structures that shape society as a whole.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
