1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
10

I need help on this .... will reward brainliest

History
1 answer:
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D. It strengthened the nations of Western Europe against Soviet influence through economic stability.

Explanation:

The Marshall plan was an overall plan to give financial aid to Western European countries.

You might be interested in
Which of the following did Martin Luther believe was required for people to gain salvation? a. Faith b. Charity c. Bible study d
AveGali [126]
The answer is C, bible study. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton supported the creation of the bank of the United States because it would
xenn [34]
Help ensure the economic stability of the new nation
6 0
3 years ago
How does the right to petition, right to vote, freedom of speech, press, and assembly impact POLITICAL SYSTEMS?
Arte-miy333 [17]
In political systems that allow and protect this right, the system is able to be altered by the people if they think that it should be. This means that if they disagree with something, they are able to petition it without being harassed or arrested. This can change the political system if the system gets to where the people don’t have rights and they will try and change that.
8 0
3 years ago
If you were a member of Congress how would you have treated the South after the Civil War? Would you have had different plans li
SIZIF [17.4K]
I would most possibly do the same thing, or take the south back to US as brothers, but I might also add a little punishment. The punishment would be limited import for a period of years (1, or 5). I would also not allow them to vote or participate in any political meeting, congressional decisions, etc.

Hope this helps, you might have a different opinion however, but as I think, it would be better to punish them for
1. Not obeying the rules (still having slavery)
2. Electing a secondary president.
3. Helping the war happen.
4. Trying to become independent from the rest of US.
5 0
3 years ago
According to the ruling in Dred Scott, Congress was prohibited from
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

Prohibiting slavery in the territories.

Explanation:

According to the ruling it was decided that Congress had exceeded their authority when ratifying the Missouri Compromise, and therefore "had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories west of Missouri and north of latitude 36°30" (Britannica.com).

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was the song dynasty able to continue its prosperity despite threats from the
    13·1 answer
  • The tendency to report on events from a liberal point of view is an example of __________.
    14·2 answers
  • How were the Ostrogoths affected by settling in the Western Roman Empire?
    11·2 answers
  • Why authorities wrote slave code
    15·1 answer
  • How was most of the territory west of texas obtained by the united states?
    11·1 answer
  • 12(5t + 2) what’s the answer
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the resolution of the federal government’s fiscal problems so critical to the success of the new nation?
    5·1 answer
  • Movement from one place to another is called
    5·2 answers
  • Describe either Mussolini, Stalin, or Hitler by giving 5 facts to show them at totalitarian leaders (pick only 1 leader):
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a way to make production more efficient?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!