Answer:
Q3. In the South, Martin Luther King, Jr. dealt with issues of racial discrimination, forced segregation by the police, and legal issues like the abolition of the Jim Crow laws. In the North, he had to deal with economic issues. Poor people were everywhere in the cities and they had no chance of improving their lives. The schools for the poor had low standards and did not provide the good training needed for the chance of finding better jobs. Many of the whites were vying with the blacks for the same kind of jobs.
Explanation: I love history
The opinion expressed in the text above, is that of American colonists. It was voice in relation to their unfair trade with Britain.
In colonial times, the British did not want to American colonies to trade with any other nation apart from them and the British also overcharged them high prices for manufactured goods because they were the only supplier.
The American colonists responded by:
- Smuggling goods in from other nations
- Boycotting British goods
At times, the opposition to having to solely buy British goods was so great that it led to acts of sabotage. It was also one of the grievances listed in the Declaration of Independence.
In conclusion, the American colonists resented not having to trade with other nations and they were tired of having to pay high prices for British goods.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2665741.</em>
I would think D. This is the only one that is an invalid technique to change a law. Any of the first three may be viewed by some as wrong, but many can agree that resorting to any means as low as violence not only is wrong, but unnecessary and will not bring change as easily.
<span />
