The mechanism that is least likely to inactivate a tumor-suppressor gene is chemical modification.
Tumor suppressor genes, also abbreviated as TSG, are the ones that check the cell cycle and regulate them. They inhibit any damaged gene from moving ahead in the cell cycle. If the tumor suppressor genes are inactivated anyhow, it can lead to cancer.
Chemical modification is the process of chemically modifying the structure of a protein. It is a beneficial process when used efficiently as it help to derive the product of interest. Therefore this process is least likely to cause inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.
To know more about tumor suppressor genes, here
brainly.com/question/16188646
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em><u>Cytokinesis</u></em>
<em><u>hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>help</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>:</u></em><em><u>)</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>✌</u></em><em><u>❤</u></em>
Answer:
Light bounces off a white cement sidewalk.
i believe the answer is commensalistic symbiosis
The presence of stapylococcus aureus in skin as normal flora doesn't give the human host any benefit, while stapylococcus aureus could find food on the human skin. Since only one side has got the profit, the symbiosis would be called commensalistic symbiosis. It was different for the normal flora inside the intestine because the host got some benefit, thus it was mutualistic symbiosis.
the answer is C, because I'm smart and I know that's it's right