I think the best
choice for the answer is <span>"Presidents can veto an act of congress".</span><span>
<span>The system of check
and balance is based on the principle that no institution or individual may
hold the power which no one can challenge; in short one branch of a system will
limit the power of another branch which can prevent the abuse of power.</span></span>
Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
Answer:
It demands the President that he must notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and stop armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days. The Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the President.
Explanation:
The President must notify Congress within 2 days of military action to stop armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days. In the Constitution it divides powers between Congress and the President.
