The type of conflict which is implied in the above passage is Person vs. Self.
In the short story “The Gift of Magi,” the American writer O. Henry speaks about the feeling of love and the emotions related to it. The couple Della and Jim are so much in love with each other that they would sacrifice anything for their partner to be happy. Since they are poor, they both fall short in arranging money for the Christmas gift. Della wanted to buy a platinum chain for Jim’s watch, but her savings were not enough for the gift. Della decided to sell off her long hair and buy a platinum chain for Jim's watch while Jim sold off her watch to buy a beautiful comb for Della's beautiful hair. The last scene of the story reflects on their love for each other which is beyond the materialistic nature of the world. Their sacrifice for each other made them the wisest people like Magi.
A figure of speech in which something is concrete is called a symbol
Helen Keller woman was an amazing woman. Though she was a person with large setbacks in her life, she never let that stop her form becoming a memorable woman.
She worked hard and concentrated on her work. She was actually the first blind-deaf woman to get a degree in arts. She should be an inspiration to all, whether big or small, successful or not.
She is a role model for success. With a drive that is hard to find.
Helen Keller, when she was young had a teacher that helped her. As years went by, she felt it to be her duty to work hard and accomplish many things.
I really hope this helps and was wondering if anybody else answers this, could I get Brainliest? Thanks and good luck! :)
Answer:
An Ad Hominem fallacy is when someone personally attacks you to avert the audience from the real point.
Explanation:
<u>Example</u>: Person 1 - <em>"We should raise the minimum wage!"</em>
Person 2 - <em>"Oh please, don't listen to her, she's not even smart</em>
<em> enough to run a business!"</em>
Person 1 attacked Person 2 without even saying why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea. Ad Hominem is when someone insults another person instead of giving reasoning to why their opinion/statement is a bad idea. They try and steer you away from the point so that you agree with them. Maybe Person 1 isn't smart enough to run a business, but maybe she has a good idea in why they should raise the minimum wage.
