1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
REY [17]
3 years ago
6

What is senatorial courtesy in deciding state judicial nominations?

History
2 answers:
skelet666 [1.2K]3 years ago
5 0
Is the custom in the U.S. Senate of refusing to confirm a presidential appointment to office opposed by both senators from the state of the appointee or by the senator of the Presidents party
Andreas93 [3]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Senatorial courtesy in deciding state judicial nominations is the agreement United States Senators have to support another member of the Senate when opposing the appointment to the federal office of a nominee of the US President from the state of that Senator. It is an unofficial political custom. In other words, Senatorial courtesy considers that no candidate can be appointed to a position in the government without the "OK" check of the senators that belong to the same home state as the nominee.

You might be interested in
Please help!
REY [17]
Under the treaty of the Guadalupe - Hidalgo , the Mexican American War ended in favor of the United States , this also relinquished the United States with 525,000 square miles of land from the Southern Border 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
US History PLEASE HELP<br> How does federalism guard against tyranny?
seropon [69]

Answer:

Federalism guarded against tyranny by first dividing between two distinct governments. The portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments... Federalism gave powers to the central government. They gave powers to the states, and they shared powers together.

Explanation:

hope it helps

3 0
3 years ago
Joyce is thinking about spending Saturday night at the movies, although she has many other choices for how to spend her Saturday
Debora [2.8K]
C I think it would be c
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please and think I was any help with this so please and help me
melomori [17]
D would be the best answer. The larger hammer would have a greater mass indeed. So it would creat more friction between the nail and the hammer creating more force being applied to the nail. Therefore the nail being able to go into the wood.
5 0
3 years ago
Social Darwinism was used as a justification
ArbitrLikvidat [17]
Social Darwinism<span> was a sociological theory popular in late nineteenth century europe and the United States. Maybe?</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The US and USSR engaged in proxy wars by
    11·1 answer
  • As part of the economic opportunity act, what was the purpose of the job corps?
    14·2 answers
  • Why were white tailed deer almost driven to extinction? What strategies were used to recover their population?
    11·1 answer
  • What did Marcus Garvey advocate for blacks? improvement of separate but equal facilities for both blacks and whites education fo
    11·2 answers
  • How did the France's American colonies differ from Spain's American colonies?
    5·1 answer
  • Using the map in section 1, answer these questions: where did the first americans come from
    6·1 answer
  • The xia dynasty is considered by most historians to be the first Chinese dynasty. True or False
    7·1 answer
  • The man known ad the "father of the American industrial revolution" is
    7·2 answers
  • Where did the first battles of the American revolution take place?
    15·2 answers
  • Explain y-dna testing​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!