<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
The first of the Crusades<span> began in 1095, when armies of Christians from Western Europe responded to Pope Urban II's plea to go to war against Muslim forces in the Holy Land.</span>
obviously not
bruuh little kids are so annoying
The communist party killed the Royal family. Lenin... didn't care about the war and neither did the people and the people wished for peace and food.
