This question is a little confusing to me
The Oslo Accords simply did not take into account factors that would influence its interpretation. For example, the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre, in which at least 39 Palestinians were killed by a single Israeli gunman (who was beaten to death once he run out of ammunition), is often blamed for undermining Palestinian trust in the process. Similarly, the expansion of Israeli settlements (although the Oslo agreements, sillily enough, stipulated no such ban) and blockades caused the deterioration of economic conditions, and much frustration for Palestinians. These factors caused a drop in support for the accord and for those who supported it. However, the PA acknowledges that the settlements have actually provided 12,000 temporary jobs to Palestinian construction workers.
And on the Israeli side, the increase in terror attacks and refusal of the insurgency groups such as Hamas to respect the Oslo agreements caused much frustration for Israelis who lost faith in the Accords as well
The Northern Alliance fought a defensive war against the Taliban government. ... The US invaded Afghanistan, providing support toNorthern Alliance troops on the ground in a two-month war against the Taliban, which they won in December 2001.
It led to an unanimous 8-0 ruling against nixon bc of the watergate scandle
Two party systems are most common in the English-speaking countries of the world and have been for some time, although many people think that it is detrimental to the political environment.
