Answer:
The correct answer would be, Enterprising.
Explanation:
With reference to John Holland's Personality Job Fit Theory, people belonging to the Enterprising type prefer verbal activities in which there are opportunities to influence others and attain powers.
According to John Holland's theory of Personality Job fit, A person's traits of personality will reveal an insight as to adaptability within an organization. This theory explains the Person and organization Fit with each other.
The Enterprising category of people are the ones who prefer to talk and engage in the verbal activities so that they can influence others with their speaking power and attain their objectives.
The gill-withdraw reflex in the aplysia (sea-slug) decreases in intensity with successive presentations of a weak stimulus. this is an example of Non - Associative learning.
A process is when an organism's behavior toward a given stimulus evolves over time without any obvious linkage with consequences or other stimuli that might trigger such change.
The foundation of non-associative learning is therefore frequency. Sensitization and habituation are the two primary types of nonassociative learning. Comparative learning is an alternative.
Animals of all kinds, including protozoans and primates, can learn, or alter their behavior in response to experience.
A broad division between associative and non-associative learning processes can be made.
Non-associative learning happens in response to a single stimulus without reinforcement, whereas associative learning involves the association of two formerly unrelated stimuli with reinforcement.
It's debatable and not entirely clear how to distinguish between these two main learning types.
Learn more about NON - Associative learning here
brainly.com/question/13530246
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>The concept of "Human Nature" is the believe that there are some naturally existing ways that human naturally think, feel and act</em>. The idea is that some of these attribute are innate to the human species and that it defines humanity and what it means to be human. However, some of the challenges put forward by anti-fundamentalists like the philosopher David L. Hull is<em> the temporal and contingent rarity of this "essential sameness of human being" in biology</em>. Other scientific basis of the inherent human behavior like <em>Instinctual behavior and other complex behavior as observed has also been known to be malleable and not fixed as opposed to the fundamentalist that argue that this inner human nature is the same and fixed</em>.
Yes, I do agree with the challenges.
I agree with this challenges from the fact that the idea of what it means to be human is diverse and different across culture, people and even the individual. <em>Some culture promote and encourage hostility as a way of defending and expanding itself, while others see this act as inhumane</em>, and some people do not see themselves as deviants because of their believe that they are exercising their human nature. some other basis is upbringing. <em>A child isolated from the rest of the world and groomed into a specific nature will retain that nature, which shouldn't be so if the internal human natures exists and is as dominant as fundamentalists of this idea claim.</em>
