Usually the reason is D. It can make us biased, I don't see any other option making sense
The correct answer is D. The modernist era took place in the 1800 and 1900's, and authors were heavily influenced by events such as World War I and the Great Depression. These things gave many people pessimistic views on the world.
This argument illustrates the slippery slope fallacy as Leo Panchello was used to create a happy picture of how much hard work local business owners put in and then goes on to tell how the light rail would destroy the local business and ruin all of their hard work which brings a sad ending.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
This is known as a mistaken belief, a faulty or failed reasoning especially one based on unsound argument.
Hence, the fallacy makes the argument weak because there's no indication that a light rail would destroy a main local business in the town as when constructing a light rail, they do not tear up the street, instead, they make the light rail a part of the street
A slippery slope fallacy is a course of action that is rejected because there is little or no evidence that one insists to lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end.
Read more about<em> fallacy </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1971023
#SPJ1
Answer:
The meaning of this is that burning books is not as terrible as not writing them at all. Stafford is trying to say that if you have an idea for a book and you do not write the book, or start it, but never finish, then that is worse then burning a book that's already written.
Explanation:
I not 100% sure but I hope it helps :)
