Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.
Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.
I believe the answer is Pantheism.
Pantheism is the concept that view the whole universe as the embodiment of the God Himself.
Because of this, we could see depiction of God's presence in basically every single thing that exist around us.
Answer:
No, because Linda did not intend for the Russian Foreign Intelligence Entity to see her email.
Explanation:
The act of gathering secret information about a competing government to provide one's own nation military or political advantage. It may include the study of diplomatic paper, documents, data, broadcast, etc. It may involve spying, a covert operation conducted by an individual operating under secret identity to gather sensitive information on behalf of another agency or country. Because Linda has no intention to reveal the information, she should not be charged with espionage.
Battle of Lexington by François Godefroy 1775
The Battles of Lexington and Concord in Massachusetts were the first battle between American Minutemen and the British army. It was an American victory that forced a British widthdrawal from the countryside back to Boston.
