Answer: They are different for criminal and civil cases because the legal standard for deciding the criminal outcome follows a different method.
In beyond reasonable doubt, the standard for deciding a criminal charge requires evidence that is sufficient to eliminate any doubts a reasonable person might entertain about whether a claim is more likely to be true than not.
In preponderance of evidence the legal standard for deciding the outcome of civil disputes, requires the evidence to be sufficient that a claim is more likely to be true than not.
They are different because a criminal case is an offense against the state or community but the civil case is a case against member(s) of a community or between individuals.
B) is the answer because the Emperor of Rome had more power to veto laws and command armies, make new laws. The Senate had less power, correct if i am wrong. Hope this helps
Answer:
C. Verstehen
Explanation:
Max Weber's Comprehensive Sociology helps us understand the social world based on the actions of individuals in context, a concept called Verstehen, which indicates that we must put ourselves in the place of individuals who will be studied to understand their actions.
Born in Efurt, Germany, Max Weber (1864-1920) is one of the leading thinkers who contributed to the construction of sociology. Like Karl Marx, however, Weber embarked on a gigantic range of subjects and contributed to the development of philosophy, politics, economics, history, and law. Weber was strongly influenced by the ideas of Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim, and was also critical of the works of these great thinkers.
<span>Why do we exist? Every one has wondered that. Now to be willing give up that existence for something actually proves that we are living for something, such as for family or country. For some, to live is to serve the god they believe created them.</span>