1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IgorC [24]
3 years ago
10

Categorize each of them as positive or normative.1. Killing people is bad. 2. By executing convicted murderers, the government m

ay deter potential murderers and, therefore, decrease the murder rate. 3. It is immoral for the government to kill people. 4. The government should not execute anyone, even murderers.
Social Studies
1 answer:
alexgriva [62]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1. Normative

2. Positive

3. Normative

4. Normative

Explanation:

A certain situation is considered as 'normative'  if it is expected to happen by the large majority of people in a certain type of society. It will be considered as 'positive' if it is not expected by most people but predicted to have a positive improvement to the society.

From the sample above, option 2 is the only positive one because not all citizens might get on board for letting the criminals off the execution.

You might be interested in
In an experiment, a group of participants ate ice cream that was packaged in a red carton and another group of participants ate
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

collected from the research participant

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What did miners in California find in the blue sand and sticky soil that caused them problems when searching for gold?
shutvik [7]
The California miners found silver in the blue sand and sticky soil which caused problems because they were primarily looking for gold and there was a lot of silver in the way. 
7 0
3 years ago
How did the Shang dynasty gain control of the Yellow River valley?
zysi [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Friend me and i'll mark brainliest
Olenka [21]

Answer:

Okay! Sure thing

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
_____ holds that the supreme court should overturn the elected branches of government reluctantly and as a last resort.
lisabon 2012 [21]
The answer is <span>judicial restraint.
</span><span>judicial restraint is a way for the Government to limit the power held by members of the judiciery branch.
Because of this restraint, A judge need to be 100% sure that a certain law is unconstitutional before striking it.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is an ethical​ dilemma?​ (A) An ethical dilemma is a synonym for a legal dilemma. (B) An ethical dilemma is a situation tha
    8·1 answer
  • What page will you find information on Mont Blance?Go to that page and tell me what important about Mont Blanc.
    11·1 answer
  • In what body must the impeachment of a federal official begin?
    8·2 answers
  • Land that is suitable for farming
    12·1 answer
  • Sprawl is the tendency of cities to grow outward in an unchecked manner, which is particularly notable in automobile cities.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following did the idea of the social contract lead the Founding Fathers to believe? (3 points) a that they were jus
    14·2 answers
  • Which European nation has developed a parliamentary system of government, and whose political leader is known as the
    10·1 answer
  • What's something smart but easy to write an essay on and can you tell me about it? good answers well are reworded brainly
    14·2 answers
  • How can you show you respect your partner's feelings? ​
    8·2 answers
  • Self-determination theory has ignited some controversies. an important issue is:_______. a. the three organismic needs being non
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!