Colloquial? I think. Hope this helps
Answer:
1.associations formed for mutual benefit, especially between countries or organizations~alliances
2.a ceasefire agreement, not a surrender~armistice
3.November 11, 1918, the day that the Germans and Allies signed the armistice~Armistice Day
4.a movement arising from World War I that found glory in war and exerted a radical authoritarian style often accompanied by violence~fascism
5.the policy of maintaining a large military establishment to be used aggressively at a moment's notice~militarism
6.fighting that involves an army digging long trenches at the front, from which soldiers can fight and remain protected~trench warfare
7.a form of government that recognizes no limits and no individual freedoms for its citizens~totalitarianism
Explanation:
Answer:
are made by a decision reached by vote of majority rule of the representatives of the people...
Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.
While both Greek and Romans were pretty ethnocentric by modern standards, the Romans assimilated far more people into their institutional lives.
Many non-Greeks adopted Gteek lifestyles, language and habits after the age of Alexander, but the cross-pollination was more frequently cultural than political. Cleopatra might have dressed like an Egyptian queen and patronized the Egyptian gods, but she wouldn't have had Egyptian generals or Egyptian judges. The Greeks tended to settle into the cultures they occupied like the British in India: remaining separate from and believing themselves superior to the people around them, even while encouraging the 'natives' to adopt their culture habits.
Romans did a much more thorough job assimilating the peoples they conquered. Non-Romans could and did become citizens, even from very early times. This started with neighboring groups like the Latins, but eventually extend to the rest of Italy and later to the whole empire. Eventually there would be "Roman" emperors of Syrian, British, Spanish, Gallic, Balkan, and North African descent Farther down the social scale the mixing was much more complete (enough to irritate many Roman traditionalists). This wasn’t just a practical accommodation, either — when emperor Claudius allowed Gauls into the Roman Senate he pointed out that by his time the Romans had been assimilating former enemies since the days of Aeneas.