Answer:
Politicians and government officials. President Theodore Roosevelt was a leader of the Progressive movement, and he championed his "Square Deal" domestic policies, promising the average citizen fairness, breaking of trusts, regulation of railroads, and pure food and drugs.
Explanation:
Outlaws tended to seek refuge in Indian Territory because "a. The Territory was not under U.S. law" although this is not entirely true because although many Indians did not feel the need to operate under US law, many US officials believed they should.
A military coup in Spain encouraged Agustín de Iturbide to help the cause of freedom in Mexico.
A) Spain
Answer:
Crusading had become more expensive by the end of the 13th century. A Crusade army used to be made up of knights who served under a lord and paid for their own expenses. Many nobility sought royal service as a result of economic difficulties. As a result, royal armies became more professional, and many knights and foot troops were paid to serve. Furthermore, with the expansion of royal authority, major Crusades could no longer be cobbled together by feudal lords, but were increasingly reliant on kings, who were prone to being distracted by domestic affairs.
Explanation:
This is plagiarism free. I give you permission to use these exact words. lol dont know if this helps
<span>Direct face-to-face lobbying is "the gold standard" of lobbying. Everything else is done to support the basic form. Face-to-face lobbying is considered to be the most effective because it allows the interest to directly communicate its concerns, needs, and demands directly to those who possess the power to do something politically. The lobbyist and the public official exist in a mutually symbiotic relationship. Each has something the other desperately needs. The interest seeks governmental assistance and the public official seeks political support for future elections or political issue campaigns. The environment for such lobbying discussions is usually the spaces outside the legislative chambers or perhaps the offices of the legislators. The legislative arena has characteristics that facilitate the lobbying process. It is complex and chaotic. Out of the thousands of bills that might be introduced in a legislative session, sometimes fewer than a hundred are actually passed. There is never enough time to complete the work on the agenda—not even a fraction of the work. The political process tends to be a winner-takes-all game—often a zero-sum game given the limited resources available and seemingly endless lists of demands that request some allocation of resources. Everyone in the process desperately needs information and the most frequent (and most useful) source of information is the lobbyist. The exchange is simple: the lobbyist helps out the governmental officials by providing them with information and the government official reciprocates by helping the interests gain their objectives. There is a cycle of every governmental decision-making site. At crucial times in those cycles, the needs of the officials or the lobbyists may dominate. For lobbyists in a legislative site, the crucial moments are as the session goes down to its final hours. For legislators, the closer they are to the next election, the more responsive they are to lobbyists who possess resources that may help.</span>
