Please help!

2 answers:

7 0

Under the treaty of the Guadalupe - Hidalgo , the Mexican American War ended in favor of the United States , this also relinquished the United States with 525,000 square miles of land from the Southern Border

Goshia [24]4 years ago

3 0

The Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, signed on February 2, 1848, was the treaty that ended the Mexican-American War. The treaty also settled the territorial disputes between the United States and Mexico. The two major features of the treaty were:

525,000 square miles were taken away from Mexico by the United States, including parts of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.
Mexico gave up all claims to Texas, recognizing the Rio Grande as their northern border.

You might be interested in

The Constitution defines the relationship between the government and its citizens because it

jeka94

Answer:

clearly defines power of the people and that of the gvt

Explanation:

constitution is mainly set of agreed principles

4 0

3 years ago

What helps to account for the fact that three times the number of people voted in the presidential election of 1828 as in the el

SashulF [63]

Explanation:

by 1828 voting laws have been changed in Most states to give women the right to vote so your answer would be

6 0

3 years ago

During the final years of World War II, how did the Allies gain control of the Atlantic Ocean?

mihalych1998 [28]

C-better anti-submarine technology

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following measures were taken when the Allies dealt with war criminals that violated provisions of the Geneva Conve

valentinak56 [21]

I believe the correct answer is C. Hope this helped!
-Twix

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Where did churchill believe the allies should focus their efforts and why

Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

Sixty years ago, Allied political leaders and military commanders at the highest strategic levels fretfully considered the question of when the war in Europe would end and what that end would look like. Guessing would not be useful, and hopes could not be blind. The coming of the end of the war needed to be a matter of educated assessment, flexible planning and unprecedented coordination within government and the armed services.

Fortunately, Winston Spencer Churchill proved to be a master at meeting all of those demands. Britain’s prime minister had an uncanny ability to anticipate the course of events and to encourage or admonish as necessary. Above all, Churchill clearly foresaw the end of war in Europe. He showed such sound judgment, in fact, that one could say his predictions make a handsome bookend to his other, long-recognized predictions in the 1930s about the coming of the war. First as min-ister of defense and later as prime minister and a key member of a multinational coalition, Churchill masterfully managed the situation and never lost his faith in the war’s eventual outcome. He was also brilliantly adept at preparing his nation and its allies for the problems that they would face when peace finally did return.

Explanation:

5 0

4 years ago