1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maru [420]
3 years ago
10

PLEASE HELP ITS TIMED

Mathematics
2 answers:
oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago
6 0
The 3rd parabola has a negative rate of change: You notice than within the interval [0 , 20] the curve is "going down"
Whereas the 4th parabola's rate:
it's negative between [0 and 1.5] and positive starting 1.5 and up
krek1111 [17]3 years ago
3 0
Answer: The third one.

Look at the slope for the segment 0-2. This is the only graph that has a negative slope, meaning that it has a negative rate of change. 
You might be interested in
Is 2.6 a rational number or a whole number
Nonamiya [84]
Its a rational number because whole numbers dont consist of decimals nor fractions
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose you want to have $400,000 for retirement in 30 years. Your account earns 4% interest.
Ne4ueva [31]

Answer:

if he wants to have $400000 on gis bank in 30 years at 4 %rate then he needs to deposit $15151.5 per month

5 0
4 years ago
Can you answer the questions that I didn't put answers in please
Nata [24]
For The Letter B Yes, The Rate Changes Because You are Adding More Stuff Into Whatever You making And You Can Lower It Too By Subtracting. Every Time You add Something Something Changes Just Like Your Quotion.
8 0
3 years ago
Asako deposits $1000 into a bank account that pays 1.5% interest compounded annually. Which inequality can she use to determine
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

Given question is incomplete; here is the complete question.

Asako deposits $1000 into a bank that pays 1.5% interest compounded annually. Which inequality can she use to determine the minimum time in years 't' she needs to wait before the value of the account is 20% more than its original value?

A. 1000 . 1.01t > 1200

B. 1000 . 1.01t > 1.2

C. 1.015^t>1200

D. 1.015^t>1.2

Formula to get the final amount by compounding is,

Final amount = \text{Initial amount}\times(1+\frac{r}{n})^{nt}

Here, r = rate of interest

n = number of compounding in a year

t = Time or duration of investments (In years)

Initial amount = $1000

Final amount = 20% more than its original value = $(1000 + 0.2×1000) = $1200

r = 1.5% = 0.015

Inequality that represents the final amount 20% more than the initial value,

1000(1+\frac{0.015}{1})^{1\times t} > 1200

1.015^t > 1.2

Therefore, Option D will be the correct option.

4 0
3 years ago
A colony of ants carried away 16 of your muffins. That was 4/5 of all of them! With how many did you start?
Murrr4er [49]
20 because 4/5 is 16 so 4•5=20 like 4•4=16
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • I added a screenshot of my question
    5·1 answer
  • Convert the following metric units of weight. a. 40 centigrams to grams b. 53 milligrams to grams c. 0.54 grams to decigrams d.
    7·1 answer
  • I'm in dire need of help with this question.
    12·2 answers
  • Use the distributive property to simplify each expression.
    13·1 answer
  • Check the functions whose inverses are also functions.
    5·2 answers
  • 8x+3(x+5)−5(x−4)<br><br> A. 6x + 35<br><br> B. 6x + 1<br><br> C. 6x−5<br><br> D. 43x
    9·1 answer
  • Id.k this should be ez for you ig
    8·2 answers
  • -5x&lt;25 what is te answer to this equation
    14·1 answer
  • Solve this problem below please its further maths
    10·2 answers
  • In which situation below would you want to use the Explicit Formula instead of the Recursive Formula?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!