Answer:
D. Benedict is your answer
Answer:
So as to help in solving cases before the cases reaches the supreme court.
Explanation:
One of the reason for the 1851 constitution in Ohio is about the Judicial system or arm of government which is to make sure that new district courts are being added to state to the state court system.
Although there has been constitution before the 1851 constitution there is a need for a new one because of many factors. For instance, in the year 1851 there are up to 90 counties which are too many for the supreme Court to meet annually(because the supreme Court has to visit each county one time in a year).
The Establishment of district courts help in solving cases before the cases reaches the supreme court.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
as a way to explain the European view of the Americas in the years shortly after Columbus's voyages
Answer:True
Explanation: Have a nice day :)
If the system were being designed today, such a design probably would be rejected as unfair. Part of the problem is that the Framers were dealing with a less lopsided distribution. The ratio between most populous state and least populous stat in 1789 was about 7 to 1. Today, the ratio between California and Wyoming population is 50 to 1.
But the Senate made sense to the Framers in 1787 for a particular reason. At that time, all 13 former colonies were like independent nations or independent countries. They could mint their own coins, print their own money, and conduct international diplomacy directly with other nations. There are lots of reasons this was unsatisfactory. It produced economic chaos and a poor prospect of winning future wars, but it did give each state the status of a country.
Now, imagine you’re a small state like New Hampshire. Right now, you completely control your own destiny. Why do you want to join a Union unless you’re guaranteed a strong voice in that Union? Now, all the arguments that people still have about the Electoral College (“The big states would push all the little states around!”) actually do apply.
It is the Senate that does a superb job… if anything TOO good a job… of protecting “small states rights.” You can argue that it is an unfair system, and it probably is… but the point is this: In 1787, the question of how to get small states like New Hampshire to join this new Union, which was after all seemed like a risky experiment, was a big problem.
It’s really for political reasons, not absolute fairness, that the Senate was created in such a way as to give equal representation to each state. It seemed necessary in 1787. But there were lots of things that could not be foreseen, such as the rise of a strong national culture and the eventually lopsided ratios between the most populous and least populous states.
Now, let me address the “House of Representatives” question. How can the Senate be based on 2-senators-per-state while the House is based on population?
