Answer:
(B)- Just inside the lobby of the Air and Space Museum, the Wright brothers' plane and Lindbergh's Spirit of St. Louis.
Explanation:
"Sentence fragment" is term defined when the sentence is not complete in form. It is a collection of words to form a sentence but it is not a complete sentence. There is always a missing word or verb and they do not convey a complete meaning to the sentence.
"Just inside the lobby of the Air and Space Museum, the Wright brothers' plane and Lindbergh's Spirit of St. Louis".
The above sentence does not provide a complete sentence. It does not convey any meaning to the reader. It is an incomplete sentence from which the reader cannot derived any meaning from.
Thus the sentence fragment is ---
(B)- Just inside the lobby of the Air and Space Museum, the Wright brothers' plane and Lindbergh's Spirit of St. Louis.
Several studies conducted by Nisbett and his colleagues suggest that people who grow up in east Asian cultures think more <u>holistically </u>than people who grow up in western cultures.
<h3>What is holistic thinking?</h3>
A person who is known to be a holistic thinker is one who looks at everything as an aspect of a whole.
They are known to be people who nothing can ever stands alone and nothing is said to be linear in time or in space in their very eyes.
Therefore, Several studies conducted by Nisbett and his colleagues suggest that people who grow up in east Asian cultures think more <u>holistically </u>than people who grow up in western cultures.
Learn more about Asian cultures from
brainly.com/question/25871918
#SPJ1
Answer:
A weak or flawed person with no standing. Also called man of straw. See judgment proof. More On This Topic. Legal Aid: Free And Low-Cost Help When You Need It. Eleven Types of Legal Motions in U.S. Law. The Legalities Of Hate Speech. Legalities Of Bitcoin And Other Cryptocurrency.
Explanation:
Explanation:
: a trial that is conducted fairly, justly, and with procedural regularity by an impartial judge and in which the defendant is afforded his or her rights under the U.S. Constitution or the appropriate state constitution or other law.
<span>This is criticizing the speaker. This makes it difficult to effectively listen when the listener already knows that there is a fact or point that is going to be used against the speaker. In addition, by interrupting, the rest of the points that might be made by Sven are lost in her rebuttal.</span>
