1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zina [86]
3 years ago
6

In what way did some of the enlightenment thinkers differ in their views

History
2 answers:
MariettaO [177]3 years ago
7 0
One way would be religious thought; the churches role in the government, religions role in society and in the mind. 
antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
4 0
Humanism is a big role in this. Humanism is the idea of thinking more about the individual (The things people felt and created were just as important as faith and religion) Since philosophers were now thinking with humanism influencing them, they thought more about the individual person themselves and their role in society. Unlike earlier thinkers who thought about people as a whole and the Church's role in society. People began to come up with the ideas that the Church is not the answer to everything.
You might be interested in
Would he support or oppose the Manifest Destiny? Why?
iogann1982 [59]

Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny was the belief that the United States was destined to extend its territory to the Pacific Ocean. ... Some Americans were opposed to manifest destiny because other nations (Mexico & Great Britain) claimed the land and because they felt an expansive nation would be too large to govern.

6 0
3 years ago
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
The American President who received the Nobel Peace Prize for his work with Japan and Russia was
Sholpan [36]
I'm pretty sure the answer is A. Hope it helped.
5 0
3 years ago
What war occurred due to the French and Indian War, the Proclamation of 1763, and the Stamp Act? *
klemol [59]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Revolutionary War

5 0
3 years ago
What is the greatest expense for the state of Oklahoma?
Helga [31]

The greatest expense of the state of Oklahoma is the healthcare for the people.

Explanation:

Oklahoma is a federal state in the United States. As all states, it has its own governing bodies, its own policies, budget, and of course its own projects and expenditures.

There are variations between the states in the United States when it comes to their expenditure as in what sector they spend the most, but one sector that seems to always be at the top is the healthcare, and Oklahoma is not an exception. In fact, the healthcare is the biggest expense of Oklahoma, accounting from around 7 billion USD annually.

The second biggest expense of this state is the education, with the government spending around 5 billion USD on it. The pensions come in third with around 3 billion USD, and right behind them are the transportation and the welfare each accounting from around 2 billion USD annually.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Cause and effect for the Portuguese exploration
    12·1 answer
  • Do you think that lincoln measures to deal with disloyalty
    11·1 answer
  • How is the Vietnam War unique?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. The EEC, EC, and EU primarily focused on what aspect of Europe?
    11·1 answer
  • What does the scale on a map do? *
    14·2 answers
  • Which type of government gives more power to the states over the national/central government?
    5·1 answer
  • How was china conditions before contact with the western countries?
    10·1 answer
  • David claims that it will take him less than 2 minutes with his car
    14·1 answer
  • Which would not be a plebeian?
    14·2 answers
  • With which of these statements would Cleisthenes most likely agree?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!